Ace the MRI Challenge 2025 – Dive Into the World of Magnetic Magic!

Disable ads (and more) with a premium pass for a one time $4.99 payment

Question: 1 / 210

Which pulse sequence is best for demonstrating magnetic susceptibility effects during a hemorrhagic infarct?

Spin echo

Gradient echo

The gradient echo pulse sequence is particularly effective for demonstrating magnetic susceptibility effects, especially in cases of hemorrhagic infarcts. This is because gradient echo sequences are sensitive to magnetic field variations caused by the presence of deoxyhemoglobin and other paramagnetic substances associated with blood products.

In the case of hemorrhagic infarcts, the accumulated blood can create localized magnetic susceptibility differences, which result in signal loss or variations in signal intensity. The gradient echo technique capitalizes on these variations, resulting in a more pronounced appearance of the hemorrhage compared to other pulse sequences.

Spin echo sequences, on the other hand, are less sensitive to these susceptibility effects because they use a 180-degree refocusing pulse that mitigates the impact of field inhomogeneities. Fast recovery and inversion recovery sequences may offer contrast in specific circumstances, but they are not specifically tailored for highlighting the magnetic susceptibility effects as effectively as gradient echo. Hence, when assessing for hemorrhagic infarcts, the gradient echo pulse sequence stands out as the best choice.

Get further explanation with Examzify DeepDiveBeta

Fast recovery

Inversion recovery

Next

Report this question

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy