Ace the MRI Challenge 2026 – Dive Into the World of Magnetic Magic!

Question: 1 / 400

Which parameter combination produces the best spatial resolution in MRI?

5mm slice thickness, 128 x 128 matrix

3mm slice thickness, 256 x 256 matrix

2mm slice thickness, 512 x 512 matrix

The combination that produces the best spatial resolution in MRI would indeed involve parameters that maximize the detail and clarity of the images. In this case, the option featuring a 2mm slice thickness and a 512 x 512 matrix stands out because both of these factors significantly enhance spatial resolution.

A thinner slice thickness, such as 2mm, allows for finer sections of the anatomy to be imaged, reducing partial volume effects where signals from adjacent structures can overlap. This thinner slice captures more detail within the volume being scanned, making it possible to distinguish small anatomical features more clearly.

Furthermore, increasing the matrix size to 512 x 512 provides a greater number of pixels used to represent the image. A higher matrix size means that each pixel can represent less area of the anatomical structure being scanned, contributing to improved image clarity and detail. The combination of a thin slice and a high matrix size creates a superior spatial resolution, allowing for excellent visualization of small structures and fine details in the images produced.

In contrast, other options offer either thicker slices or lower matrix sizes, leading to reduced spatial resolution. Thicker slices may contribute to lower detail, and smaller matrix sizes can lead to larger pixel sizes, both of which diminish the ability to differentiate closely spaced anatomical features

Get further explanation with Examzify DeepDiveBeta

4mm slice thickness, 256 x 256 matrix

Next Question

Report this question

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy